On 31.10.2013, at 19:10, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Max Horn <m...@quendi.de> writes: > >> On 31.10.2013, at 10:36, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here are the patches that allow transport helpers to be completely >> transparent; >>> renaming branches, deleting them, custom refspecs, --force, >> --dry-run, >>> reporting forced update, everything works. >> >> I looked through this patch series in detail, and it looks fine to >> me. Indeed, it fixes several nuisances when using remote-helpers, and >> as such would be a definite win. > > Nice. > >> In other words: Would be really nice to see these applied! > > The series is sitting on the 'pu' branch, and I think there were > some "fixup" suggestions during the review, so it may need to be > rerolled before advancing to 'next'.
You are of course right. Next time I comment, I'll make sure to check whether previous review suggestions have been picked up.
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail