On 31.10.2013, at 19:10, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:

> Max Horn <m...@quendi.de> writes:
>> On 31.10.2013, at 10:36, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Here are the patches that allow transport helpers to be completely
>> transparent;
>>> renaming branches, deleting them, custom refspecs, --force,
>> --dry-run,
>>> reporting forced update, everything works.
>> I looked through this patch series in detail, and it looks fine to
>> me. Indeed, it fixes several nuisances when using remote-helpers, and
>> as such would be a definite win.
> Nice.
>> In other words: Would be really nice to see these applied!
> The series is sitting on the 'pu' branch, and I think there were
> some "fixup" suggestions during the review, so it may need to be
> rerolled before advancing to 'next'.

You are of course right. Next time I comment, I'll make sure to check whether 
previous review suggestions have been picked up.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to