Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> +test_expect_success 'use refspec' '
>>> + git fast-export --refspec refs/heads/master:refs/heads/foobar master
>>> | \
>>> + grep "^commit " | sort | uniq > actual &&
>> It feels somewhat redundant that you have to twice say that you are
>> pushing your "master", once with --refspec and then the branch
>> name. Is this the best we can do?
> As this has been discussed before and no other solution came forward, yes.
We need to take that "no other solution came forward" with a grain
of salt. After all, this is your itch, and if nobody was interested
in helping you (which I think that we both understand entirely
plausible, given the recent history), it only means you didn't think
of any other solution.
I didn't think things through, but at the external UI level, I see a
possibility of a nicer way to express the above.
In our "push" refspec (and export is about pushing what we have), a
colonless refspec A is a short-hand for A:A, so the traditional
git fast-export master
can be thought of, in a new world order with a patch that lets you
do a ref mapping, a short-hand for an identical mapping:
git fast-export master:master
It follows that the syntax naturally support
git fast-export refs/heads/master:refs/heads/foobar
I would think.
That approach lets you express ref mapping without a new option
--refspec, which goes contrary to existing UI for any commands in
Git (I think nobody takes refspec as a value to a dashed-option in
the transport; both in fetch and push, they are proper operands,
i.e. command line arguments to the command), no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html