On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Christian Couder
<chrisc...@tuxfamily.org> wrote:
> To avoid spamming the list again, I am going to send the following
> patches from the 86 patch long series to replace prefixcmp() with
> starts_with():
> [PATCH v2 00/86] replace prefixcmp() with starts_with()
> [PATCH v2 01/86] strbuf: add starts_with() to be used instead of prefixcmp()
> [PATCH v2 02/86] diff: replace prefixcmp() with starts_with()
> [PATCH v2 08/86] transport*: replace prefixcmp() with starts_with()
> [PATCH v2 40/86] environment: replace prefixcmp() with starts_with()
> [PATCH v2 86/86] strbuf: remove prefixcmp() as it has been replaced with 
> starts_with()
> If there are no problems with them, then I will suppose that most of
> the patches are ok and probably send them all unless I am asked not
> to.

I'm not exactly sure I understand the point of not squashing all those
patches together ?
It's not like one is going without the others, or that the commit
message provides some new information (except for the name of the
file, but that is not very relevant either). The downside is that it's
_many_ messages to bypass when reading mails from small-screen devices
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to