Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:

> Add test cases using git fetch-pack --diag-url:
>
> - parse out host and path for URLs with a scheme (git:// file:// ssh://)
> - parse host names embedded by [] correctly
> - extract the port number, if present
> - seperate URLs like "file" (which are local)
>   from URLs like "host:repo" which should use ssh
> ---
>  t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh | 72 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh b/t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh
> index 9136f2a..7f55b95 100755
> --- a/t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh
> +++ b/t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ test_expect_success 'shallow fetch with tags does not 
> break the repository' '
>  '
>  check_prot_path() {
>       > actual &&
> -     (git fetch-pack --diag-url "$1" 2>&1 1>stdout) | grep -v host= >actual 
> &&
> +     (git fetch-pack --diag-url  "$1" 2>&1 1>stdout) | grep -v host= >actual 
> &&

What is this change about???

>       echo "Diag: url=$1" >expected &&
>       echo "Diag: protocol=$2" >>expected &&
>       echo "Diag: path=$3" >>expected &&
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ check_prot_path() {
>  
>  check_prot_host_path() {
>       > actual &&
> -     git fetch-pack --diag-url "$1" 2>actual &&
> +     git fetch-pack --diag-url  "$1" 2>actual &&

Likewise...

> @@ -564,29 +564,69 @@ do
>                               hh=$h
>                               pp=$p
>                       fi
> -                     test_expect_success "fetch-pack $p://$h/$r" '
> +                     test_expect_success "fetch-pack --diag-url $p://$h/$r" '
>                               check_prot_host_path $p://$h/$r $pp "$hh" "/$r"
>                       '
> -                     # "/~" -> "~" conversion for git
> -                     test_expect_success "fetch-pack $p://$h/~$r" '
> +                     # "/~" -> "~" conversion
> +                     test_expect_success "fetch-pack --diag-url $p://$h/~$r" 
> '

Is this part, especially the "s/ for git//" bit, an "oops, the
earlier one was wrong" fix to [05/10]?  If so, please don't.
Instead, please get it right in that patch before sending the series
out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to