On 26/11/13 04:06, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" > <kno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 22/11/13 02:18, Duy Nguyen wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> Have you run the tests with this patch? It seems that it breaks >>>> quite a lot of them, including t5500, t5503, t5510, among others. >>> >>> I guess it's caused by builtin/fetch.c:backfill_tags(). And the call >>> could be replaced with >>> >>> transport_set_option(transport, TRANS_OPT_DEPTH, NULL); >>> >> >> Not sure what you mean, >> https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/t/t5550-http-fetch.sh doesn't >> call backfill_tags. What do you mean?
That was a typo, I meant https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh > I wrote "I guess" ;-) I did not check what t5550 does. Any hint on where to start looking? It doesn't look like any test is using a non-positive depth, so I'm really confused. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
