On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:15:07PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Hmph, it looks like it is following the usual "zero-or-more dashed
> >> options, zero-or-more revs and then zero-or-one double-dash and then
> >> zero-or-more paths" rule to parse the thing. "foobar" is a file and
> >> not a rev, so "--" should not be there, no?
> >> Confused why you think it is not right...
> > Because once you say "--", then all ambiguity goes away, no?
> But it is tricky (not from implementation but from semantics point
> of view) to make rev-parse follow that "-- separates revs and paths"
> rule literally. The primary use of rev-parse is to convert revs in
> extended SHA-1 expressions into concrete object names, so that
> scripts do not have to worry about having to deal with object names
> in a format that is not 40-hexdecimal. "git rev-parse foobar --"
> that gives
> without any error, because 'foobar' cannot be made into an object
> name, would be behaving in a way unexpected by the calling script,
Yes, I do expect an error. But it should not be "-- after filename". It
should be "foobar is not a revision".
Thinking on it more, though, the problem is purely limited to wrong
error messages. If "foobar" exists as a rev, we do parse it correctly.
If it does not, we are in the wrong code path, but it _must_ be an error
at that point (either because foobar does not exist as a file, or it
does and has "--" after it).
It would be nice to get the error messages right, though. I do not see
any reason why it could not follow the same steps as "git log",
converting revisions (or throwing an error as appropriate) on the left
side of the "--", and passing through the right side untouched.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html