On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:49:01PM -0500, shawn wilson wrote: > What's the best way of doing this? I'd prefer this be a pre hook on > the server that rejects and the user has to rebase and fix their > stuff. Though, if there's some way to make it easier for users not to > mess up (other than an alias for everything which I'll probably do > anyway) that would be useful. Any ideas?
I don't believe the sign-on-rebase stuff ever got picked up, so at the moment this wouldn't be a good idea, since each and every commit would have to be manually amended. It seems it never made it from the list into Junio's queue whatsoever. And the always-sign code is only in pu at the moment. But if you wanted to anyway, you could simply use a pre-receive hook and walk the tree, verifying the signatures of each commit against some canonical list of approved keys. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Description: Digital signature