2014/1/14 Heiko Voigt <hvo...@hvoigt.net>:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:22:31PM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:46:08PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>> > I would like to step back a bit and get back to the original problem
>> > at hand: Francescos original use case of an attached head for direct
>> > commits on a stable branch in a submodule. How about we finish
>> > discussing the exact solution of that first. AFAIK that is already
>> > solved with the following:
>> >
>> >  * Trevor's first patch[2] to create a branch on initial clone of a 
>> > submodule
> [...]
>> > That should be all (and IIRC Francesco agreed) needed for that use-case.
>> That was my understanding [3] ;).

I've been silent these days but yes: I confirm Trevor's second patch
iteration[1] gives, IMO, a better meaning of the
submodule.<name>.branch property and is perfectly fine for my use
case, to the point of stopping pursuing for my non behavior changing
patch[4] (I still think it deserved some more in depth reviews, though
;) ).


[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/239967
[2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/239973
[3]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/240139
[4]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/239956
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to