Kirill Smelkov <> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:42:41AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Kirill Smelkov <> writes:
>> > I agree object data should be immutable for good. The only thing I'm 
>> > talking
>> > about here is mode, which is parsed from a tree buffer and is stored in
>> > separate field:
>> Ah, I do not see any problem in that case, then.
>> Thanks.
> Thanks, that simplifies things for me.


Be careful when traversing N-trees in parallel---you may have to
watch out for the entry ordering rules that sorts the following
paths in the order shown:


Inside a single tree, you cannot have 'a' and 'a/b' at the same
time, but one tree may have 'a' (without 'a/b') while another one
may have 'a/b' (without 'a'), and walking them in parallel has
historically been one source of funny bugs.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to