Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:01:08AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Here is the difference between the posted series and what I queued
>> after applying the changes suggested during the review.
> I was going to send a reroll after the received comments. Could you
> put this on top of 6/6, just to make sure future changes in t5537
> (maybe more or less commits created..) does not change the test
> It fixes the test name too. I originally thought, ok let's create
> commits in one test and do fetch in another. But it ended up in the
> same test and I forgot to update test name.
Surely, and thanks for being careful. Will squash it in.
> -- 8< --
> diff --git a/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh b/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh
> index 1413caf..b300383 100755
> --- a/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh
> +++ b/t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ EOF
> # This test is tricky. We need large enough "have"s that fetch-pack
> # will put pkt-flush in between. Then we need a "have" the server
> # does not have, it'll send "ACK %s ready"
> -test_expect_success 'add more commits' '
> +test_expect_success 'no shallow lines after receiving ACK ready' '
> cd shallow &&
> for i in $(test_seq 10)
> @@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ test_expect_success 'add more commits' '
> cd clone &&
> git checkout --orphan newnew &&
> test_commit new-too &&
> - git fetch --depth=2
> + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" git fetch --depth=2 &&
> + grep "fetch-pack< ACK .* ready" ../trace &&
> + ! grep "fetch-pack> done" ../trace
> -- 8< --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html