On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> If --quiet is set, we should not be printing anyway. If not, I thinkg >>> we could only print "auto packing in background.." when we actually >>> can do that, else just print the old message. It means an #ifdef >>> NO_POSIX_GOODIES here again though.. >> >> Didn't you change it not to die but return nosys or something? > > Ah, the problem is that it is too late to take back "... will do so in > the background" when you noticed that daemonize() did not succeed, so > you would need a way to see if we can daemonize() before actually > doing so if you want to give different messages. > > "int can_daemonize(void)" could be an answer that is nicer than > NO_POSIX_GOODIES, but I am not sure if it is worth it.
Or we could pass the "quiet" flag to daemonize() and let it print something in the #ifdef NO_POSIX_GOODIES part. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
