On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:23 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Johannes Sixt <j.s...@viscovery.net> writes:
>>> Am 2/12/2014 13:55, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>>> Johannes Sixt <j.s...@viscovery.net> writes:
>>>>> Running test suite of 'next' on Windows fails in t5310-pack-bitmaps with
>>>>> the following symptoms. I haven't followed the topic. Have there been
>>>>> patches floating that addressed the problem in one way or another?
>>>>> (gdb) run
>>>>> Starting program: D:\Src\mingw-git\t\trash
>>>>> directory.t5310-pack-bitmaps/..\..\git.exe rev-list --test-bitmap
>>>>> HEAD
>>>>> [New thread 3528.0x8d4]
>>>>> Bitmap v1 test (20 entries loaded)
>>>>> Found bitmap for 537ea4d3eb79c95f602873b1167c480006d2ac2d. 64 bits
>>>>> / 15873b36 checksum
>>>> Does reverting a201c20b41a2f0725977bcb89a2a66135d776ba2 help?
>>> YES! t5310 passes after reverting this commit.
>> Oh.  I just looked through the backtrace until finding a routine
>> reasonably related with the regtest and checked for the last commit
>> changing it, then posted my question.
>> Then I looked through the diff of the patch and considered it
>> unconspicuous.  So I commenced reading through earlier commits.
>> I actually don't have a good idea what might be wrong here.  The code is
>> somewhat distasteful as it basically uses eword_t and uint64_t
>> interchangeably, but then this does match its current definition.
> Perhaps __BYTE_ORDER or __BIG_ENDIAN is misdefined and the ntohll() is 
> skipped?

That is indeed the case.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to