Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
> Lower depth than default (50) does not sound "aggressive" to me, at
> least from disk space utilization. I agree it should be configurable
Do you mean you want to keep "--aggressive" to mean "too aggressive
in resulting size, to the point that it is not useful to anybody"?
Shallow and wide will give us, with a large window, the most
aggressively efficient packfiles that are useful, and we would
rather want to fix it to be usable, I would think.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html