Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> Lower depth than default (50) does not sound "aggressive" to me, at
> least from disk space utilization. I agree it should be configurable
> though.

Do you mean you want to keep "--aggressive" to mean "too aggressive
in resulting size, to the point that it is not useful to anybody"?

Shallow and wide will give us, with a large window, the most
aggressively efficient packfiles that are useful, and we would
rather want to fix it to be usable, I would think.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to