Omar Othman <omar.oth...@booking.com> writes: > Brandon:
Please, don't top-post on this list. Look how other people answer to each other and follow the use. > Please note that what I am asking for is not always dropping the > stash, but doing that *only* when the merge conflict is resolved. This > is simply getting the whole command to be consistent. If you do `git > stash pop` and it succeeds, the stash reference is dropped. If you do > git stash pop` and it succeeds *after resolving the merge conflict*, > the stash reference is *not* dropped. This is *not* consistent and > *is* a user experience problem. I'm not asking about dumbing git down > by any means. Can you describe precisely what you would expect, e.g. what Git's output should look like after such and such command? -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
