On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > I'd worry slightly, though, that there are other schemes where that > behaves poorly. Should we optimize for git's version numbering, or for > what most other projects want? There could even be room for two types of > version-compare. But before thinking about that, I'd want to know why > glibc behaves as it does.
We don't have to force one version style for all projects. We could provide --sort="thisver:refname" vs. "thatver:refname", or put the "-pre" part in config file. The important thing is we can control the version algorithm. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
