David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Sun He <sunheeh...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sun He <sunheeh...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> git-compat-util.h | 4 ++--
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
>>> index cbd86c3..4daa6cf 100644
>>> --- a/git-compat-util.h
>>> +++ b/git-compat-util.h
>>> @@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ extern int suffixcmp(const char *str, const char
>>> *suffix);
>>>
>>> static inline const char *skip_prefix(const char *str, const char *prefix)
>>> {
>>> - size_t len = strlen(prefix);
>>> - return strncmp(str, prefix, len) ? NULL : str + len;
>>> + while( *prefix != '\0' && *str++ == *prefix++ );
>>> + return *prefix == '\0' ? str : NULL;
>>
>> Documentation/CodingGuidelines?
>
> Mostly relevant for tabification here, not helping much otherwise.
"Imitate existing code" would let you spot that we have SP outside
the () pair, not inside, for controls like while/for/if, and we
usually do not explicitly compare things with 0, NULL or '\0'.
Together with the "empty statement should occupy its own line" you
mentioned, I tend to agree with you that some people may benefit
from them explicitly spelled out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
