Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <> writes:

> After squashing or fixing up, you may want to have a final look at the
> commit, edit some more if needed or even do some testing. --postedit
> enables that. This is (to me) a paranoid mode so either I enable it
> for all squashes and fixups, or none. Hence a new option, not new todo
> commands that give finer selection.

If we were to adopt Michael's (?) idea of allowing flags to each
insn in the insn sheet, would this restriction be easily lifted?

That is, instead of saying "squash", you say "squash --stop" or

> diff --git a/ b/
> index a1adae8..42061fc 100644
> --- a/
> +++ b/
> @@ -571,6 +571,11 @@ do_next () {
>                       ;;
>               esac
>               record_in_rewritten $sha1
> +             if test -n "$postedit"
> +             then
> +                     warn "Stopped at $sha1... $rest"
> +                     exit_with_patch $sha1 0
> +             fi
>               ;;

I would have expected that any new code would stop only at the last
squash (or fixup) in a series of squashes, but this appears to stop
even at an intermediate squashed result, which will not appear in
the final history.  Am I misreading the patch (or misunderstanding
the intent of the patch)?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to