On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> wrote:
> On 2014-03-11 22.03, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Benoit Pierre <benoit.pie...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Add (failing) test: with commit changing the environment to let hooks
>>> now that no editor will be used (by setting GIT_EDITOR to ":"), the
>>> "edit hunk" functionality does not work (no editor is launched and the
>>> whole hunk is committed).
>>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pie...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100755 t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh
>>> diff --git a/t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh 
>>> b/t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh
>> I'll move this to t/t7514-commit-patch.sh for now while queuing.
> This line is problematic:
>         echo e | env GIT_EDITOR="sed s/+line3\$/+line2/ -i" git commit -p -m 
> commit2 f
> (sed -i is not portable:
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xcu/sed.html)
> The whole test hangs in a forever loop loop under MacOS:
> debug=t verbose=t ./t7514-commit-patch.sh
> Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,/,e,?]? @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>  line1
> +line3
> I think perl can be used instead of sed (but I haven't found the exact syntax 
> yet)

Or maybe change the test to just 'touch' a temporary file or change
its content like Jun Hao did with for its version of the tests:


Should I make a third version? I'll simplify and move the tests to
t/t7514-commit-patch.sh and add a test for the '--dry-run' case. And
- 'now' => 'know' in one of the commit message
- sign off the last patch (which I forgot to do)
- fix the indentation in one of the patch

A: Because it destroys the flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting dumb?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to