Thank you for the feedback and tweaks!

> Is the eye-candy output to the standard output what is the most
> interesting during the execution of a rebase?  Wouldn't we be
> more interested to make sure that we did transplant the history
> on the same commit between two cases?

I agree. I'll consult the other tests to see how to write such a test.

> Can we use `git name-rev` to put the actual name here, so that people
> who have not done what they intended can hopefully notice sooner?

This sounds like a great idea! Doing so would mirror how `git checkout`
behaves; checkout informs the user of which branch they have switched
to when using the "-" shorthand: "Switched to branch 'master'".

Should I submit a new patch, or reroll this one?

- Brian Gesiak
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to