Thank you for the feedback and tweaks! > Is the eye-candy output to the standard output what is the most > interesting during the execution of a rebase? Wouldn't we be > more interested to make sure that we did transplant the history > on the same commit between two cases?
I agree. I'll consult the other tests to see how to write such a test. > Can we use `git name-rev` to put the actual name here, so that people > who have not done what they intended can hopefully notice sooner? This sounds like a great idea! Doing so would mirror how `git checkout` behaves; checkout informs the user of which branch they have switched to when using the "-" shorthand: "Switched to branch 'master'". Should I submit a new patch, or reroll this one? - Brian Gesiak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html