Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>
>>> diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
>>> index a452407..e55e5b9 100644
>>> --- a/wt-status.c
>>> +++ b/wt-status.c
>>> @@ -1509,19 +1509,23 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct
>>> wt_status *s)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + const char *gone = s->no_gettext ? "gone" : _("gone");
>>> + const char *behind = s->no_gettext ? "behind " : _("behind ");
>>> + const char *ahead = s->no_gettext ? "ahead " : _("ahead ");
>>
>> Having to repeat the same string constant twice (and a half for the
>> variable name) each is an eyesore. I wonder if we can do better,
>> perhaps with:
>>
>> #define LABEL(string) (s->no_gettext ? (string) : _(string))
>>
>> and then
>>
>> color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, LABEL(N_("gone")));
>>
>> or something along those lines?
>
> I first thought about trying something clever with the preprocessor, but
> since it's only for 3 strings, I went the KISS way. I tend to prefer my
> version for simplicity, but no strong opinion here.
Then I'll squash 61bf9709 (SQUASH??? fix decl-after-stmt and
simplify, 2014-03-20) in before merging the patch to 'next'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
