On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:03:46AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > > > I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like > > this. There is a good reason. Yes, you can't simply reorder hunks just > > like this. But you can get the same effect by prefixing the header: > > Yes, that is one of the things I personally have on the chopping > block. Having to deal with more than occurrences of the same > pathname in the input made things in builtin/apply.c unnecessarily > complex and I do not see a real gain for being able to concatenate > two patches and feed it into a single "git apply" invocation.
Well - I expect that this will surprise some people: gnu patch accepts this, and it's a natural assumption that it works. There could be tools producing such diffs, too. Anyway - we can drop this from patch-id and git apply at the same time? -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
