On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:03:46AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes:
> > I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like
> > this.  There is a good reason.  Yes, you can't simply reorder hunks just
> > like this.  But you can get the same effect by prefixing the header:
> Yes, that is one of the things I personally have on the chopping
> block.  Having to deal with more than occurrences of the same
> pathname in the input made things in builtin/apply.c unnecessarily
> complex and I do not see a real gain for being able to concatenate
> two patches and feed it into a single "git apply" invocation.

Well - I expect that this will surprise some people: gnu
patch accepts this, and it's a natural assumption
that it works. There could be tools producing such diffs, too.

Anyway - we can drop this from patch-id and git apply at
the same time?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to