Jonathan Nieder <> writes:

> 140 patches worth of churn once every couple of years is not terrible,
> but I really don't want to see this becoming a pattern. :/


> And I don't see how the upside in this example warrants it.


It'd be good if we don't _add_ such things to the tree.

But IMO it's such a minor thing that once it _is_ in the tree, it's
not really worth the patch noise to go and fix it up.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to