On 04/02/2014 07:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>> This reduces the amount of string editing gyrations and makes it
>> unnecessary for callers to know how to derive the filename from the
>> lock_filename.
> Hmph.
> Is it worth duplicating the whole thing?  If you are planning to
> break the invariant lock_filename === filename + LOCK_SUFFIX in
> future changes in the series, it is understandable, though.

That is indeed the plan, but I'm splitting that change into a future
patch series because this one is getting big enough already dealing with
correctness issues.


Michael Haggerty
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to