On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Robert Dailey wrote:
> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
> Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for
> ONLY branches that I list. The key here is that the graph should also
> show relationships between only those branches that I list. In other
> words, any ancestors that I do not explicitly specify should not be
> rendered in the graph.

What about using ^<branch> notation to exclude certain branches? See for
example SPECIFYING RANGES in git-rev-parse(1).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to