Jakob Stoklund Olesen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subversion can put mergeinfo on any sub-directory to track cherry-picks.
> Since cherry-picks are not represented explicitly in git, git-svn should
> just ignore it.
Hi, was git-svn trying to track cherry-picks as merge before?
This changes behavior a bit, so two independent users of git-svn
may not have identical histories as a result, correct?
Can you add a test to ensure this behavior is preserved?
Thanks.
Sorry, I've never looked at mergeinfo myself, mainly relying on
Sam + tests for this.
[1] - Historically, git-svn (using defaults) has always tried to
preserve identical histories for independent users across
different git-svn versions. However, mergeinfo may be
enough of a corner-case where we can make an exception.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
