On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This discard_index() code was added
> recently in e28f764 (unpack-trees: plug a memory leak - 2013-08-13).
> As a workaround, perhaps we only do so when the sequencer is running.

Hmm.. as o->result does not carry cache-tree anyway, the next
assignment after discard_index() will "destroy" cache-tree anyway. I
wrote and deleted the following sentence, but it looks like I should
rewrite again. So if cache-tree has always been destroyed before, be
careful when you try to keep cache-tree as cache-tree invalidation
code in unpack-trees.c may not be well tested.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to