On 05/06/2014 08:40 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>> It would be pretty annoying to spend a lot of time fetching a big pack,
>> only to have the fetch fail because one reference out of many couldn't
>> be updated.  This would force the user to download the entire pack
>> again,...
> Is that really true?  Doesn't quickfetch optimization kick in for
> the second fetch?

Yes, I guess it would.  I wasn't aware of that optimization.  Thanks for
the pointer.

I withdraw my objection to using atomic reference updates for fetch.


Michael Haggerty
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to