Even though POSIX.1 lists -a/-o as options to "test", they are
marked "Obsolescent XSI". Scripts using these expressions
should be converted  as follow:

test "$1" -a "$2"

should be written as:

test "$1" && test "$2"


test "$1" -o "$2"

should be written as:

test "$1"  test "$2"

But note that, in test, -a has higher precedence than -o while
"&&" and "||" have equal precedence in the shell.

The reason for this is that the precedence rules were never well
specified, and this made many sane-looking uses of "test -a/-o" problematic.

For example, if $x is "=", these work according to POSIX (it's not
portable, but in practice it's okay):

   $ test -z "$x"
   $ test -z "$x" && test a = b

but this doesn't

   $ test -z "$x" -a a = b
   bash: test: too many arguments

because it groups "test -n = -a" and is left with "a = b".

Similarly, if $x is "-f", these

   $ test "$x"
   $ test "$x" || test c = d

correctly adds an implicit "-n", but this fails:

   $ test "$x" -o c = d
   bash: test: too many arguments

Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spi...@gmail.com>
Inspired from this discussion 

 contrib/examples/git-repack.sh |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/examples/git-repack.sh b/contrib/examples/git-repack.sh
index f312405..96e3fed 100755
--- a/contrib/examples/git-repack.sh
+++ b/contrib/examples/git-repack.sh
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ case ",$all_into_one," in
                                existing="$existing $e"
-               if test -n "$existing" -a -n "$unpack_unreachable" -a \
-                       -n "$remove_redundant"
+               if test -n "$existing" && test -n "$unpack_unreachable" && \
+                       test -n "$remove_redundant"
                        # This may have arbitrary user arguments, so we
                        # have to protect it against whitespace splitting

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to