Jeff King <> writes:

> One thing that this misses (as does your original script) is the
> reflogs. Doing "branch -m" to rename a branch will actually move the
> reflogs, too, but there is otherwise no way to access that
> functionality.
> It does not seem unreasonable to teach "git update-ref" to do renames to
> take advantage of this (it would be fairly simple; the logic is already
> encapsulated internally in a rename_ref function).

Sounds sensible.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to