On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 13:37 -0700, Jacob E Keller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently cloned the master branch of the git repo, and when I ran make
> test, it fails on test 102 of the t3200-branch.sh test cases.
>
> not ok 102 - tracking with unexpected .fetch refspec
> #
> # rm -rf a b c d &&
> # git init a &&
> # (
> # cd a &&
> # test_commit a
> # ) &&
> # git init b &&
> # (
> # cd b &&
> # test_commit b
> # ) &&
> # git init c &&
> # (
> # cd c &&
> # test_commit c &&
> # git remote add a ../a &&
> # git remote add b ../b &&
> # git fetch --all
> # ) &&
> # git init d &&
> # (
> # cd d &&
> # git remote add c ../c &&
> # git config remote.c.fetch
> "+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*" &&
> # git fetch c &&
> # git branch --track local/a/master remotes/a/master &&
> # test "$(git config branch.local/a/master.remote)" =
> "c" &&
> # test "$(git config branch.local/a/master.merge)" =
> "refs/remotes/a/master" &&
> # git rev-parse --verify a >expect &&
> # git rev-parse --verify local/a/master >actual &&
> # test_cmp expect actual
> # )
> #
> # failed 1 among 102 test(s)
> 1..102
>
> However, when I run the test file manually it passes. I am currently
> running through a verbose output test run to see if I can find more
> useful output..
>
> For reference, the commit I am testing against is:
>
> 72c779457cd7 ("line-log: use commit_list_append() instead of duplicating its
> code")
>
> Thanks,
> Jake
I ran the test wit the GIT_TEST_OPS set to --verbose, and the output I got is:
expecting success:
rm -rf a b c d &&
git init a &&
(
cd a &&
test_commit a
) &&
git init b &&
(
cd b &&
test_commit b
) &&
git init c &&
(
cd c &&
test_commit c &&
git remote add a ../a &&
git remote add b ../b &&
git fetch --all
) &&
git init d &&
(
cd d &&
git remote add c ../c &&
git config remote.c.fetch "+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*" &&
git fetch c &&
git branch --track local/a/master remotes/a/master &&
test "$(git config branch.local/a/master.remote)" = "c" &&
test "$(git config branch.local/a/master.merge)" =
"refs/remotes/a/master" &&
git rev-parse --verify a >expect &&
git rev-parse --verify local/a/master >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
)
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/jekeller/git/git/t/trash
directory.t3200-branch/a/.git/
[master (root-commit) ce450c7] a
Author: A U Thor <aut...@example.com>
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 a.t
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/jekeller/git/git/t/trash
directory.t3200-branch/b/.git/
[master (root-commit) 19acec0] b
Author: A U Thor <aut...@example.com>
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 b.t
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/jekeller/git/git/t/trash
directory.t3200-branch/c/.git/
[master (root-commit) ea1ac38] c
Author: A U Thor <aut...@example.com>
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 c.t
fatal: Invalid refspec '+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/b/*'
not ok 102 - tracking with unexpected .fetch refspec
#
# rm -rf a b c d &&
# git init a &&
# (
# cd a &&
# test_commit a
# ) &&
# git init b &&
# (
# cd b &&
# test_commit b
# ) &&
# git init c &&
# (
# cd c &&
# test_commit c &&
# git remote add a ../a &&
# git remote add b ../b &&
# git fetch --all
# ) &&
# git init d &&
# (
# cd d &&
# git remote add c ../c &&
# git config remote.c.fetch
"+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*" &&
# git fetch c &&
# git branch --track local/a/master remotes/a/master &&
# test "$(git config branch.local/a/master.remote)" = "c"
&&
# test "$(git config branch.local/a/master.merge)" =
"refs/remotes/a/master" &&
# git rev-parse --verify a >expect &&
# git rev-parse --verify local/a/master >actual &&
# test_cmp expect actual
# )
#
# failed 1 among 102 test(s)
1..102
make[2]: *** [t3200-branch.sh] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jekeller/git/git/t'
make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jekeller/git/git/t'
make: *** [test] Error 2
I have to run this as part of the "make test" setup. Is there a way to
run a single test script instead of the entire test suite? If so, then I
may be able to perform a bisect against the test to find the commit
where this breaks.
Thanks,
Jake
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����ا���ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf
