Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> "Making sure A's parent is B" would be an
>>> idempotent operation, no? Why not just make sure A's parent is
>>> already B and report "Your wish has been granted" to the user?
> ... and here you say we should report "your wish has been granted"...
Normal way for "git replace" to report that is to exit with status 0
and without any noise, I would think.
>>> Why would it be simpler for the user to get an error, inspect the
>>> situation and realize that his wish has been granted after all?
> ... but for me reporting to the user "your wish has been granted" and
> warning (or errorring out) saying "the new commit would be the same as
> the old one" are nearly the same thing.
> So I wonder what exactly you are not happy with.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html