On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 11:29 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes: > > > This is not how the rest of the current tests work. I will submit a > > patch which fixes up the current --sort tests (but not every test, for > > now) as well. > > I do not want to pile more work that is unrelated to the task at > hand on your plate, i.e. clean-up work, so I would assign a very low > priority to "fix up the current tests". At the same time, existing > mistakes are not excuses to introduce new similar ones, hence my > suggestions to the added code in the patch I saw. >
It was trivial to fix at least the --sort tests, so I submitted a patch that goes before this one to fix those as well. Thanks, Jake
