"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes: > On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 09:03 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... >> >> Yes, that is fun. >> >> >> >> I actually think your "In 'version:pefname' and 'wersion:refname', >> >> we want be able to report 'pefname' and 'wersion' are misspelled, >> >> and returning -1 or enum would not cut it" is a good argument. The >> >> callee wants to have flexibility on _what_ to report, just as the >> >> caller wants to have flexibility on _how_. In this particular code >> >> path, I think the former far outweighs the latter, and my suggestion >> >> I called "silly" might not be so silly but may have struck the right >> >> balance. I dunno. > ... > I agree. But what about going back to the older setup where the caller > can output correct error message? I'm ok with using an enum style > return, to be completely honest. I would prefer this, actually.
Depends on which older setup you mean, I think. The one that does not let us easily give more context dependent diagnoses that lets us distinguish between version:pefname and version:refname by returning only -1 or an enum? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
