On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And on the other hand a one-patch-at-a-time merge would
> try to apply X (with no effect, since it's already applied)
> and then try to apply the revert of X. The net effect would
> be to revert X from "master" (bad)!
Yeah, I appreciate that. I know the type of user that would do that, and I
understand why you would want to do that and even do that by default.
However, as an expert user, I don’t need that particular type of hand holding
given the cost of more conflicts and would like an option to let me to choose
to have fewer conflicts when merging.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html