Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: >> diff --git a/t/t5704-bundle.sh b/t/t5704-bundle.sh >> index a45c316..2f063ea 100755 >> --- a/t/t5704-bundle.sh >> +++ b/t/t5704-bundle.sh >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ test_description='some bundle related tests' >> test_expect_success 'setup' ' >> test_commit initial && >> test_tick && >> - git tag -m tag tag && >> + git tag -am tag tag && > ... > Oh, wait.
In any case, the fix in 2/2 is real, and applying both and then reverting the above hunk passes the test. Also, applying both, reverting the above hunk *and* reverting the fix to bundle.c of course makes the rest fail. So I would be tempted to squash these two patches into one using the log message from the latter one, while excluding the change in the above hunk. Thanks. >> @@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' >> git tag -d third >> ' >> >> -test_expect_success 'tags can be excluded by rev-list options' ' >> +test_expect_failure 'annotated tags can be excluded by rev-list options' ' >> + git bundle create bundle --all --since=7.Apr.2005.15:14:00.-0700 && >> + git ls-remote bundle > output && >> + grep tag output && >> git bundle create bundle --all --since=7.Apr.2005.15:16:00.-0700 && >> git ls-remote bundle > output && >> ! grep tag output -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
