Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:
> Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@imag.fr>
>> ---
>> Valgrind confirms, one less unreachable block ;-).
>
> This belongs in the commit message.
>
> [...]
>> --- a/builtin/log.c
>> +++ b/builtin/log.c
>> @@ -857,20 +857,21 @@ static void add_branch_description(struct strbuf *buf,
>> const char *branch_name)
>> {
>> struct strbuf desc = STRBUF_INIT;
>> if (!branch_name || !*branch_name)
>> return;
>> read_branch_desc(&desc, branch_name);
>> if (desc.len) {
>> strbuf_addch(buf, '\n');
>> strbuf_addbuf(buf, &desc);
>> strbuf_addch(buf, '\n');
>> }
>> + strbuf_release(&desc);
>
> This is an old one. The leak was introduced by v1.7.9-rc1~1^2~12
> (format-patch: use branch description in cover letter, 2011-09-21).
>
> I was a little scared to see a leak in 'git log' code, since most of
> what log does involves looping over many commits. Luckily this one is
> only used in make_cover_letter to create a cover letter describing the
> single branch on the command line, making it is a small, one-time
> leak.
Exactly ;-).
>
> Less noise from static and dynamic analysis tools is still worthwhile,
> so for what it's worth,
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
