René Scharfe <l....@web.de> writes: > Am 06.09.2014 um 21:20 schrieb David Aguilar: >> Add dependent headers so that including a header does not >> require including additional headers. >> >> This makes it so that "gcc -c $header" succeeds for each header. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <dav...@gmail.com> >> --- > >> diff --git a/branch.h b/branch.h >> index 64173ab..a61fd1a 100644 >> --- a/branch.h >> +++ b/branch.h >> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ >> >> /* Functions for acting on the information about branches. */ >> >> +#include "cache.h" >> +#include "strbuf.h" > > cache.h includes strbuf.h, so the line above isn't necessary.
True, but is "gcc -c $header" something we want to please in the first place (not an objection, but request for opinions)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
