On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
>
> > These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted
> > earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two
> > topics need to be part of the same series.
>
> These look all sensible.
>
> Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The
> additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they
> are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to have them in the 2.2
> release.
Yes, I've delayed while thinking about the issues that Michael raised.
There are basically two paths I see:
1. These do not solve all problems/races, but are a solid base and
sensible path forward for further changes which we can worry about
later.
2. There is a better way to provide prune safety, and these patches
will get in the way of doing that.
I wanted to make sure we are on path (1) and not path (2). :)
I'll try to send out a re-roll tonight.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
