On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:13:24AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> I noticed that "git checkout $tree -- $path" will _always_ unlink and
> write a new copy of each matching path, even if they are up-to-date with
> the index and the content in $tree is the same.

By the way, one other thing I wondered while looking at this code: when
we checkout a working tree file, we unlink the old one and write the new
one in-place. Is there a particular reason we do this versus writing to
a temporary file and renaming it into place?  That would give
simultaneous readers a more atomic view.

I suspect the answer is something like: you cannot always do a rename,
because you might have a typechange, directory becoming a file, or vice
versa; so anyone relying on an atomic view during a checkout operation
is already Doing It Wrong.  Handling a content-change of an existing
path would complicate the code, so we do not bother.

But I would be curious to hear confirmation of that.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to