Hi Junio, On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > > > Some kinds of errors are intrinsically unrecoverable (e.g. errors while > > uncompressing objects). It does not make sense to allow demoting them to > > mere warnings. > > Makes sense, but the patch makes it look as if this is an "oops, we > should have done the list in patch 02/18 in this order from the > beginning". Can we reorder the patches? I considered this already, but it would more be like a squash than a reordering. And when I squashed the patches, the story did not read as clearly to me as it does now. However, if you think this argument is too weak, I will squash them. Is it too weak? Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
