"Kyle J. McKay" <mack...@gmail.com> writes: > A whitelist solves issue (1) but is no help for issue (2) unless some > additional additional part of the refs namespace were to be also > whitelisted. Perhaps something like refs/x-<anything>/... in the same > vein as the various IETF standards for experimental names.
Your (2) is about people who are _experimenting_, no? Why can't they use refs/notes/x-<anything>/* while doing so, and when that matures and proves useful to wider public we can make it more official by whitelisting refs/<that-thing> in addition to refs/notes/, and the problem is solved, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
