On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 11:08:47AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I wonder if it is worth having a "git-only" mode for core.protectNTFS. > > Turning it off entirely would make him susceptible to GIT~1 attacks. > > Yes, I think having distinctions would make sense, but I am not sure > if "git-only" vs "every questionable included" should be the > classification.
Yeah, I agree with everything you said below (I should have said "security-relevant" instead of "git-only" originally). I also agree that there may be more than two classifications, but I do not know enough about the severity of the bad effects of each type to judge. I'd leave that to the folks on each platform. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
