Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:22:52AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> And the result should merge just fine to 'maint'.
>
> Are we in agreement then that the resulting code with the helper is
> actually easier to read? I think replacing the straight ?: lines is, but
> I am on the fence on whether:
>
> const char *x = some_fun(...);
> return xstrdup_or_null(x);
>
> is better or worse than:
>
> return xstrdup_or_null(some_fun(....));
I think the latter is fine as long as some_fun(...) invocation does
not get overly long, and even the longest I saw in refs.c, i.e.
return xstrdup_or_null(resolve_ref_unsafe(ref, resolve_flags, sha1,
flags));
did not bother me too much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
