Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]> writes:

> Sorry for very late reply. I had a bug in my mail rules that caused
> this email to skip my inbox. That should be fixed now.
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
>> Regardless of that funny %1 business, I notice in
>>
>>     
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa363679%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>>
>> that each element of lpStrings array that is passed to ReportEvent()
>> is limited to 32k or so.  Wouldn't it make it a lot simpler if we
>> removed the dynamic allocation and use a fixed sized 32k buffer here
>> (and truncate the result as necessary)?  That would make the "leak"
>> disappear automatically.
>
> That's a very good point. Yes, I think that makes more sense.

OK, so I'd expect a simpler non-reallocating code to materialize
and will drop Arjun's patch for now.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to