Hi all (in particular Junio),
On 2015-01-31 22:04, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> [...] switch to fsck.severity to address Michael's
> concerns that letting fsck.(error|warn|ignore)'s comma-separated lists
> possibly overriding each other partially;
Having participated in the CodingStyle thread, I came to the conclusion that
the fsck.severity solution favors syntax over intuitiveness.
Therefore, I would like to support the case for `fsck.level.missingAuthor`
(note that there is an extra ".level." in contrast to earlier suggestions).
The benefits:
- it is very, very easy to understand
- cumulative settings are intuitively cumulative, i.e. setting
`fsck.level.missingAuthor` will leave `fsck.level.invalidEmail` completely
unaffected
- it is very easy to enquire and set the levels via existing `git config` calls
Now, there is one downside, but *only* if we ignore Postel's law.
Postel's law ("be lenient in what you accept as input, but strict in your
output") would dictate that our message ID parser accept both "missing-author"
and "missingAuthor" if we follow the inconsistent practice of using
lowercase-dashed keys on the command-line but CamelCased ones in the config.
However, earlier Junio made very clear that the parser is required to fail to
parse "missing-author" in the config, and to fail to parse "missingAuthor" on
the command-line.
Therefore, the design I recommend above will require two, minimally different
parsers for essentially the same thing.
IMHO this is a downside that is by far outweighed by the ease of use of the new
feature, therefore I am willing to bear the burden of implementation.
Do you agree?
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
