On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth
<sschube...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Is that an improvement?  Is the plural of "dup" (used as an
>> abbreviation of "duplicate") "dupes" not "dups"?
>
> My view is that the abbreviation of "duplicate" is not "dup" but
> "dupe", hence the plural "dupes".

For "duplicate" the noun, that is. For "duplicate" the verb I'd be ok
with "dup" as the abbreviation. "to dup" sounds and looks better than
"to dupe" :-)

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to