Hi all, I am a GSoC '15 aspirant for git.
In this commit I have directly associated "-" to "@{-1}" except when it refers
to a filename.
All the given tests pass(except those which shouldn't).
I have to add a failsafe for the case in when there is no branch as "@{-1}".
For this I have a
rough idea that I would have to call get-sha1() on @{-1} to check if there is
an object matching
with it. But I am not able to think of the details.
Please guide me with that and give feedback for this patch.
Signed-off-by: Sundararajan R <[email protected]>
---
builtin/reset.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/reset.c b/builtin/reset.c
index 4c08ddc..62764d4 100644
--- a/builtin/reset.c
+++ b/builtin/reset.c
@@ -203,8 +203,16 @@ static void parse_args(struct pathspec *pathspec,
*
* At this point, argv points immediately after [-opts].
*/
-
+ int flag=0; /*
+ * "-" may refer to filename in which case we should be
giving more precedence
+ * to filename than equating argv[0] to "@{-1}"
+ */
if (argv[0]) {
+ if (!strcmp(argv[0], "-") && !argv[1]) /* "-" is the only
argument */
+ {
+ argv[0]="@{-1}";
+ flag=1;
+ }
if (!strcmp(argv[0], "--")) {
argv++; /* reset to HEAD, possibly with paths */
} else if (argv[1] && !strcmp(argv[1], "--")) {
@@ -226,6 +234,8 @@ static void parse_args(struct pathspec *pathspec,
rev = *argv++;
} else {
/* Otherwise we treat this as a filename */
+ if(flag)
+ argv[0]="-";
verify_filename(prefix, argv[0], 1);
}
}
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
