Hi, On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: > Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudshekha...@gmail.com> writes: > >> +test_expect_success 'reset - while having file named - and no previous >> branch' ' > > I like having the expected behavior in the test name too. e.g. add > "fails" at the end of the sentence. > Sure. I will update this in the next patch.
>> +test_expect_success 'reset - in the presence of file named - with previous >> branch' ' >> + echo "Unstaged changes after reset:" >expect && >> + echo "M -" >>expect && >> + echo "M 1" >>expect && > > Here and elsewhere: why not > > cat >expect <<-EOF > Unstaged changes after reset: > M - > M 1 > > ? I was confused whether to use cat or echo. I thought using cat will disrupt the indentation as the EOF needs to be on a single line. This is why I chose echo. Please let me know your thoughts on this. >> + rm -rf no_previous && > > That would be best done in a test_when_finished, so that the directory > is removed regardless of whether the test failed before this line or > not. Thanks for pointing this out. I will update this accordingly. > > -- > Matthieu Moy > http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ Regards, Sudhanshu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
