Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> When I looked around, I found scores of sites that call atoi(),
> strtoul(), and strtol() carelessly. And it's understandable. Calling
> any of these functions safely is so much work as to be completely
> impractical in day-to-day code.
>
> git-compat-util.h has two functions, strtoul_ui() and strtol_i(), that
> try to make parsing integers a little bit easier.
Exactly. They were introduced to prevent sloppy callers from
passing NULL to the &end parameter to underlying strtoul(3). The
first thing that came to my mind while reading your message up to
this point was "why not use them more, tighten them, adding
different variants if necessary, instead of introducing an entirely
new set of functions in a new namespace?"
For example:
> * Am I making callers too strict? In many cases where a positive
> integer is expected (e.g., "--abbrev=<num>"), I have been replacing
> code like
>
> result = strtoul(s, NULL, 10);
>
> with
>
> if (convert_i(s, 10, &result))
> die("...");
I think strictness would be good and those who did "--abbrev=' 20'"
deserve what they get from the additional strictness, but
if (strtol_i(s, 10, &result))
would have been more familiar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
