We can use test_must_fail and test_path_* to avoid some
hand-rolled if statements. This makes the code shorter, and
makes it more obvious when we are breaking the &&-chain.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
---
 t/t4117-apply-reject.sh | 66 ++++++++-----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t4117-apply-reject.sh b/t/t4117-apply-reject.sh
index 8e15ecb..d80187d 100755
--- a/t/t4117-apply-reject.sh
+++ b/t/t4117-apply-reject.sh
@@ -56,23 +56,13 @@ test_expect_success 'apply --reject is incompatible with 
--3way' '
 
 test_expect_success 'apply without --reject should fail' '
 
-       if git apply patch.1
-       then
-               echo "Eh? Why?"
-               exit 1
-       fi
-
+       test_must_fail git apply patch.1 &&
        test_cmp file1 saved.file1
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'apply without --reject should fail' '
 
-       if git apply --verbose patch.1
-       then
-               echo "Eh? Why?"
-               exit 1
-       fi
-
+       test_must_fail git apply --verbose patch.1 &&
        test_cmp file1 saved.file1
 '
 
@@ -81,21 +71,11 @@ test_expect_success 'apply with --reject should fail but 
update the file' '
        cat saved.file1 >file1 &&
        rm -f file1.rej file2.rej &&
 
-       if git apply --reject patch.1
-       then
-               echo "succeeds with --reject?"
-               exit 1
-       fi
-
+       test_must_fail git apply --reject patch.1 &&
        test_cmp file1 expected &&
 
        cat file1.rej &&
-
-       if test -f file2.rej
-       then
-               echo "file2 should not have been touched"
-               exit 1
-       fi
+       test_path_is_missing file2.rej
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'apply with --reject should fail but update the file' '
@@ -103,25 +83,12 @@ test_expect_success 'apply with --reject should fail but 
update the file' '
        cat saved.file1 >file1 &&
        rm -f file1.rej file2.rej file2 &&
 
-       if git apply --reject patch.2 >rejects
-       then
-               echo "succeeds with --reject?"
-               exit 1
-       fi
-
-       test -f file1 && {
-               echo "file1 still exists?"
-               exit 1
-       }
+       test_must_fail git apply --reject patch.2 >rejects &&
+       test_path_is_missing file1 &&
        test_cmp file2 expected &&
 
        cat file2.rej &&
-
-       if test -f file1.rej
-       then
-               echo "file2 should not have been touched"
-               exit 1
-       fi
+       test_path_is_missing file1.rej
 
 '
 
@@ -130,25 +97,12 @@ test_expect_success 'the same test with --verbose' '
        cat saved.file1 >file1 &&
        rm -f file1.rej file2.rej file2 &&
 
-       if git apply --reject --verbose patch.2 >rejects
-       then
-               echo "succeeds with --reject?"
-               exit 1
-       fi
-
-       test -f file1 && {
-               echo "file1 still exists?"
-               exit 1
-       }
+       test_must_fail git apply --reject --verbose patch.2 >rejects &&
+       test_path_is_missing file1 &&
        test_cmp file2 expected &&
 
        cat file2.rej &&
-
-       if test -f file1.rej
-       then
-               echo "file2 should not have been touched"
-               exit 1
-       fi
+       test_path_is_missing file1.rej
 
 '
 
-- 
2.3.3.520.g3cfbb5d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to